Translate

Showing posts with label 1.4ghz processor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1.4ghz processor. Show all posts

Wednesday, 27 June 2012

Samsung Galaxy S2 vs Samsung Galaxy S3


Samsung's Galaxy S3 takes on its predecessor, the Galaxy S2 in our head-to-head comparison
Form
Samsung Galaxy S2 - 125.3x66.1x8.5mm, 116g
Samsung Galaxy S3 - 136.6x70.6x8.6mm, 133g
The Galaxy S2 formed part of an iconic visual style of its time and place, following on from the Apple iPhone, it kept the trend of a more angular and slab-like shape, with slightly softened corners and a svelte 8.5mm profile.
Although visual trends are now changing it's a design that still looks contemporary a year later. Chrome accents provide a bit of contrast to the black bodywork and the back panel features a nice textured, mesh-like surface.Samsung is known for using durable plastics, meaning we know the Galaxy S2 isn't going to fall apart any time soon, but the handset does have a slightly cheap feel for a premium model, particularly on the back panel.Samsung's successor model, the Galaxy S3, likewise follows the trends of its classmates,Samsung said the design was inspired, in part, by ‘pebbles' which is evident in the more curved shape over all.We can also see a hint of Galaxy Nexus in there as well. Interestingly, the handset doesn't have a conventional black option; colour choices are either blue or white.Like its predecessor, the Galaxy S3 features a physical home button and capacitive ‘back' and ‘menu' controls, meaning Samsung has chosen to forego Android Ice Cream Sandwich's on-screen touch controls.We mentioned earlier Samsung's use of plastics and this has extended to the Galaxy S3. The problem here, however, is that unlike HTC, Samsung hasn't opted for a high-quality matte finish plastic. The bodywork has a very tacky and cheap feel; it's extremely shiny despite its brushed texture and shows up finger prints quite a lot.
We were expecting Samsung to improve on the Galaxy S2's cheap plastic feel given that this was a common criticism in the past, but if anything it actually feels worse which is a big disappointment.
Apart from this it looks great in our view, we really like the shape, the size is not far off the original Galaxy S2 as Samsung has crammed a larger screen into a similarly-sized bodyshell, and the colour choices are refreshingly different.
In terms of appearance, we think the Galaxy S3 wins here, though the Galaxy S2 still looks good. On build quality we have to say the Galaxy S2 still reigns. We have to call this one a draw.
Display
Samsung's Galaxy S2 is fitted with a 4.3-inch Super AMOLED Plus capacitive multi-touch display, featuring Corning Gorilla Glass, an 800x480 pixel resolution and a pixel density of 217 pixels-per-inch (ppi). Although it's not top dog anymore, this is still one of the better displays on the market being very sharp, bright and vivid with rich colours and good contrast.
The Galaxy S3 is a considerable upgrade, however. Samsung has managed to squeeze a massive 4.8-inch screen into a body not much bigger than the Galaxy S2. Not only that, it uses Samsung's Super AMOLED HD technology for an improvement over the Galaxy's visual quality.
The resolution is an impressive 1280x720 pixels and churns out a pixel density of 306ppi, which, for a screen of this size, is quite an achievement. Samsung has used Corning's Gorilla Glass 2 technology so it's just as strong as the original Gorilla Glass but considerably thinner, a factor which helps keep the device slimmer overall.
Colour depth, contrast and brightness are all great here, while it may not be the sharpest display on the market it is way up there as one of the better ones and with a pixel density over 300ppi most users will probably struggle to notice the difference from other high quality screens.
Storage
Samsung is consistently quite generous when it comes to both internal and external storage space, a factor we appreciate. Both the Galaxy S2 and Galaxy S3 come in 16GB and 32GB variants for internal capacity, while the Galaxy S3 has a further 64GB option. All variants of each handset have 1GB of RAM and micro SD capability for cars up to 32GB in capacity.
Processor
Like many other areas of the Galaxy S2's build, the processor is an element which is still competitive and viable on today's smartphone market. It boasts a dual core ARM Cortex-A9 processor running Samsung's own Exynos 4210 chipset clocked at 1.2GHz with a Mali-400MP graphics processing unit (GPU) in tow.
Performance is silky smooth and you should have no problems running even the most intensive games and apps or demanding levels of multi-tasking.
The Galaxy S3 is Samsung's first quad core smartphone. It's still running ARM Cortex-A9 cores, although of course there are now four of them, but this is on the company's new Exynos 4212 chip clocked at 1.4GHz.
It still uses the same Mali-400MP GPU as its predecessor, but we can understand why, it's a good graphical powerhouse and there's no good reason to change it.
From our brief time with the Galaxy S3 we found performance to be flawless, somewhat unusual for display models of even premium handsets at big launch events.
Operating System
Now that the Galaxy S2 has been updated to the latest Android build, version 4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich , these phones are both on the same platform. With Samsung's TouchWiz interface on top you'll broadly get a similar user experience with both.
However, it's worth mentioning that the Galaxy S3 has a few extra tricks up its sleeve with Samsung's ‘intelligence' features.
This includes things like the phone being able to sense when you put the phone to your ear while typing a text, it'll take this as a cue to call the person you're texting. Smart Stay is a feature which uses the front-facing camera to detect when you're viewing the screen or looking away, the phone will appropriately toggle the screen on or off accordingly.
Keeping in trend with the iPhone 4S's Siri voice assistant, the Galaxy S3 includes a new take on voice control with S-Voice, which will allow you to do a variety of things, such as activating the camera by saying ‘I want to take a picture', or taking the phone out of standby mode by saying ‘Wake up'.
This is also configurable to an extent, for example you could make the phone wake up when you say ‘Wake up buddy,' or similar phrases.
The Galaxy S3 includes a range of unique features in this vein, but whether they'll actually be useful in practice is something which remains to be seen. A lot of fuss was made over Siri, after all, but since the iPhone 4S's launch plenty of cracks have started to show.
Camera
Both handsets run 8-megpixel primary cameras with back-illuminated sensors (BSI) and resolutions of 3264x2448 pixels. Features shared by both devices include an LED flash, geo-tagging, autofocus, touch focus, face and smile detection and image stabilization. Both also capture video at 1080p.
The Galaxy S3 distinguishes itself with some extra features including the HTC One range's ability to capture simultaneous HD video and still images, and a rapid multi-shot capable of taking 3.3 photos per second with virtually no shutter lag. It also has the ability to pick the best photo from a cluster and to automatically detect friends' faces in pictures via social networking.
The Galaxy S2 features a video light. Both phones have 2-megapixel secondary cameras with video calling capability, the Galaxy S3's can capture in 720p HD.
Samsung's latest Galaxy carries a lot more cuff in terms of features and the image quality we saw was striking.
Well coming to the verdict guys if u really have money in your pocket go opt for this fantastic upgrade. By that time let us know your views about us 

Thursday, 21 June 2012

IPHONE 4 VS HTC EVO 4G....


With the shutter now publicly lifted from iphone 4 ,hoards of APPLE followers have now ready plans to ditch their worn of 3Gs model and move on to next iteration. But if you are not wearing heart-shaped locket with Steve Jobs inside,does the move to Iphone 4 creates sense? where previous iphone release have towered over with competition every way, this year release face more stiff  outer competition then ever by.Does Apple still have what it takes to reign supreme in smartphone battle? so we stacked iphone 4 side by side to those of its intimidating competition, its HTC Android powered EVO 4G...to find out... 

Display:

The HTC EVO boasts of a much larger display screen (4.3" compared to 3.5" on iPhone 4). However, iPhone 4 comes with a far superior 960x640 pixel "Retina display", which is the highest resolution among the current crop of smartphones.

Processor:
Apple has built-in their in-house A4 processor chip in the new iPhone, which can apparently clock 1GHz of processor speed. While HTC EVO's Snapdragon processor too clocks the same speed, it needs to be noted that handset manufacturers routinely clock down the speed in order to boost the battery life. We
may not be able to comprehensively judge the performance of the two processors at the moment as we still don't know at what speed iPhone 4's A4 processor is running.

Storage:
Both the devices offer storage of up to 32GB. iPhone 4 comes in two versions offering 16GB and 32GB of storage. On the other hand, HTC EVO 4G comes with a 8GB microSD card that is expandable up to 32GB.

Network:
Like iPhone 3GS, iPhone 4 too will work over 3G network. In comparison, HTC EVO 4G shall run on Sprint's 4G network, which is a lot faster. However, we need to note that the 4G network is still not available in large parts of the country and hence may not be a determining factor for a majority of the customers.

Camera:
Both iPhone 4 and HTC EVO come with a front-facing and a rear-facing camera each. The rear-side camera on the iPhone 4 is equipped with a 5-megapixel CMOS. HTC EVO on the other hand, comes with a much higher 8-megapixel rear-side camera. However, as we have noted in the past, a higher megapixel on the camera sensor does not necessarily imply better quality images.

Video Recording:
Both the smartphones allow users to capture HD video. The iPhone 4 however captures videos at a marginally higher frames-per-second and also includes video editing functionalities.

Video Conferencing:
Again, thanks to the front-facing camera, both the devices allow video conferencing. iPhone 4 users may use the natively supported FaceTime app for Wi-Fi based video conferencing. HTC EVO users will need to purchase the Qik app that is available for $5. A basic version of the app is also available for free at the Android marketplace. Video conferencing on HTC EVO may be carried out over the carrier's 3G or 4G network apart from Wi-Fi.

Battery Life:
An improved battery life has been one of the most significant improvements in iPhone 4. Apple claimsthat iPhone 4 will provide a talk time of 7 hours on 3G and close to 14 hours on 2G. HTC EVO 4G in comparison offers only up to 6 hours of talk time.

Operating System:
iPhone 4 will come pre-installed with Apple's new iOS 4.0 that includes more than 100 new features while HTC EVO 4G currently comes installed with Android 2.1. However, it should soon get the Android 2.2 update that was unveiled by Google recently, which brings new features such Adobe Flash 10.1, Wi-Fi Hotspot etc.

Price:
AT&T has retained the older iPhone 3GS price point for iPhone 4. Users can purchase the 16GB and 32GB iPhone 4 model at $199 and $299 respectively when it goes on sale on June 24. On the other hand, HTC EVO 4G is already available with Sprint at $199 after a $100 mail-in rebate. Both the plans come with a two-year contract period.










Tuesday, 24 April 2012

Samsung Galaxy note v/s HTC radar



So taking on the clash over between Samsung Galaxy Note and HTC Radar……
Talking about Samsung galaxy note it has a Android OS v2.3 (Gingerbread), Dual-core 1.4GHz ARM Cortex-A9 processor, where as the on he other hand the HTC radar offers Microsoft Windows Phone 7.5 Mango OS, 1 GHz Scorpion processor. So there is no doubt of experiencing galaxy note as a comparatively better processor.
Well in conditions of camera galaxy note provides an 8 MP Camera With autofocus and LED flash at the same time as on the other part the radar is offering a 5 MP, 2560х1920 pixels, autofocus, LED flash camera. So visibly the galaxy note is much more capable and offers an enhanced quality camera for snapping.
The Galaxy Note, in the intervening time, has one of the largest displays in the world at 5.3-inches, providing with a Super AMOLED capacitive touchscreen which is protected by a Gorilla glass coating. The Note features multi-touch output, auto-rotate, accelerometer and gyro sensors.
The Samsung Galaxy Note comes with pixel density of 285 ppi and an attractive 800 x 1280 screen resolution.
 While the HTC radar has a 3.8 inches, S-LCD capacitive touchscreen, 16M colors
480 x 800 pixels,super lcd capacitive touchscreen.
Storage is the key to your gathered collection, so considering the memory aspect the galaxy note features in built 16GB/32GB storage, with 1 GB RAM and also has the MicroSD card slot for further storage (2 GB included). The HTC Radar has an inbuilt 8GB storage with 512 mb RAM with no card slot.
However the Samsung galaxy note could prove to be heavy on your wallets, so if money matters than go for HTC radar it’s a nice phone too…
Keep watching!!!!
Keep subscribing!!!!!

Friday, 20 April 2012

Samsung galaxy note v/s iphone 4s


Form Factor:

The iPhone 4S has more or less the same factor as the previous iPhone – iPhone 4. There has been no do up in the terms of the form factor and frankly speaking iphone is going something boring.
The Samsung Galaxy Note is relatively an enormous in terms of size. One of the surprises we had with this device was that regardless of its 146mm length and 83mm width, it’s quite thin at 9.7mm. 
Even though, some people might find it a bit heavy at 178g. 
Samsung has artistic the Note a sleek and modest design along with a large screen. The handset has been engraved tidily and makes it easy to spotlight on other aspects of the phone, such as its visuals. 

Display

Apple’s iPhone 4S fails to surprise us in the conditions of the display as it has the same 3.5-inch backlit TFT retina display as the previous iPhone. Alongside with a pixel density of 330 ppi (pixels per inch), it offers a display resolution of 640 x 960 pixels. A scratch resistant coating prevents the screen from getting smudged. The iPhone 4S display comes with multi-touch input, accelerometer and gyro sensors.
The Galaxy Note, in the intervening time, has one of the largest displays in the world at 5.3-inches, providing with a Super AMOLED capacitive touchscreen which is protected by a Gorilla glass coating. The Note features multi-touch output, auto-rotate, accelerometer and gyro sensors. 
The Samsung Galaxy Note comes with pixel density of 285 ppi and an attractive 800 x 1280 screen resolution. 
Still though the Galaxy Note is gifted with the larger screen and enhanced resolution, the iPhone 4S is still its big daddy in requisites of the screen. 


Storage:

The iPhone 4S comes in 3 storage options, 16 GB, 32 GB and 64 GB. But the associated RAM is just 512 MB. As usual, Apple hasn’t offered any external MicroSD support.
On the other hand the Samsung Galaxy Note comes in two versions – 16 GB or 32 GB. Besides, it offers you external MicroSD support to the tune of 32 GB. Next to with that, the handset also comes with standard 2 GB MicroSD card, powered with packs in a powerful 1 GB RAM.
Even lacking external MicroSD support and the lack of RAM, iPhone 4S wins this round, as one tends to favor its internal storage option in place of external storage. 
      
Processor:

Apple has gone the whole nine yards in terms of the iPhone 4S processor. It has capable the handset with an A5 chipset, the same one that powers the iPad 2. It is duly accompanied with a 1 GHz dual-core ARM Cortex A9 processor along with a SGX 543MP2 GPU.
Samsung’s Galaxy Note procedures up with a dual-core ARM Cortex A9 processor, which runs its 1.4 GHz on an Exynos chipset, along with an accompanying Mali 400 MP GPU.

Apple might have made a heroic challenge as far as endowing its iPhone 4S with an A5 processor goes, but Samsung Galaxy Note over powers it in terms of the processor. 

operating system:

Apple debuted the iOS 5 operating system by the side of with iPhone 4S at the ‘lets talk iPhone’ event. It claims that the OS is endowed with 200 new features and we think it has delivered on its guarantee. 
iOS 5 seems a handy operating system along with its Siri supporter and iMessage – which is Apple’s version of the Blackberry Messenger (BBM).
The Galaxy Note, on the other hand, currently runs
android 2.3 Gingerbread OS, though it is in procession for an Ice Cream Sandwich OS, the present operating system on the handset is, in plain terms is outmoded. 
It presently doesn’t have a lot to race with Apple’s iOS or even the Windows Phone OS. 

But, we would still say that multi-tasking is superb on the Samsung Galaxy Note handset, we are left wanting for improved features.

 Camera:

Both the Samsung Galaxy Note and Apple iPhone 4S come equipped with 8-megapixel camera that deliver a 3264 x 2448p resolution and 1080p video capture. 

Final Verdict:

The Samsung Galaxy Note is unquestionably an exclusive contribution from the company. The Apple iPhone 4S on the other hand, is a good phone, but not a renowned one like its predecessors. 
techdoll was left a bit amazed by the Note and a bit dissatisfied by the 
iphone 4s
But, the iPhone 4S is still successful due to its healthier operating system. But probably Ice Cream Sandwich handset ability even be able to defeat the iPhone 4S.  
So have technologying!!!!!
Subscribe us!!!!

Thursday, 12 April 2012

NOKIA LUMIA 800 vs IPHONE 4S

Comparing two phones.....NOKIA LUMIA 800 AND IPHONE 4S....
highlighting the important.........



Battle of supremacy:
 This month seems to be the month of major smartphone launches. A few days after Nokia announced the launch of its Windows powered Lumia 800 in India, And now, it's time for Apple to release its much-awaited iPhone 4S in India. The launch of these flagship phones in India at the same time will turn the Indian phone market into a battleground and will create a tough competition. The iPhone 4S is powered by Apple's dual-core A5 chip, the one that is also present inside the iPad 2. The A5 chip delivers up to twice the processing power and up to seven times faster graphics than the iPhone 4. On the other hand, Nokia's Lumia is powered by a 1.4Ghz processor. The iPhone 4S includes an autofocus 8 megapixel camera that has a new custom lens with a larger f/2.4 aperture. Nokia also sports an 8 megapixel camera with Carl Zeiss optics, but it has an f/2.2 aperture.

The iPhone 4S runs iOS 5, Apple's latest mobile operating system(OS) with over 200 new features. Nokia runs Windows 7.5 Mango OS.
The iPhone 4S also includes Siri, an intelligent assistant that helps users get things done just by asking. Siri can help make calls, send text messages or email, schedule meetings and reminders, make notes, search the Internet, find local businesses, get directions and more. Users can also get answers, find facts and even perform complex calculations just by asking. However, Nokia users can use other similar apps but their performance cannot match Siri. In other words, such apps can not come close to what Siri can do. The iPhone 4S weighs 140 grams. Nokia Lumia 800 weighs 142g . The iPhone 4S is 9.3 mm thin, while Nokia's Lumia 800 is 12.1 mm thin .
The iPhone 4S has a 3.5-inch retina display at 960x640p resolution. Nokia's Lumia features a 3.7 inch AMOLED ClearBlack curved display at 800x480p resolution. The iPhone 4S will be available in two variants - 16GB and 32GB. The 64GB iPhone 4S model is not currently listed on pre-order pages of both Airtel and Aircel. Nokia's Lumia 800 offers 16 GB of internal memory (no slot for micro-SD cards).
The iPhone4S allows users to use Apple's iCloud service, which is a cloud storage and cloud computing service that lets users store data on remote computer servers for download to multiple devices such as iPhones, iPods and iPads. Each account is provided 5 GB of free storage. However, Nokia Lumia 800 users can get access to Windows Live SkyDrive that sets the data storage limit for every user at a generous 25GB.
The 16GB and 32GB iPhone 4S are priced at Rs 44,500 and Rs 50,900 respectively. Nokia has announced the price of Nokia Lumia 800 in India to be 24,999. .